New Release: The Body in The Bathtub!

New Release: The Body in The Bathtub!

Happy Friday! Have a new audiobook!

The Body in The Bathtub written by Shea Macleod and narrated by Yvette Keller is now available!


Bunco night seems like a safe bet, until someone finds a dead body in the bathtub. With her friends in shock and topping the local detective’s suspect list, Viola Roberts decides it’s time once again to take matters into her own hands.

With her usual snark and disregard for the rules, Viola investigates everything from a cupcake-eating contest to the sordid affairs of the deceased’s husband. All while fending off her mother’s matchmaking attempts. She’s pretty sure she knows whodunit, but with her bunco ladies being targeted by a killer, Viola may have to decide between being right, or ending up dead.


Also, if you sign up for my newsletter you will receive the exclusive Body in The Bathtub Blooper Reel with your February Newsletter!


New (and used) Normal

New (and used) Normal

Two audiobooks in the final release stages, a monthly newsletter out (before the month is over), and a functioning kitchen: January has been a back-to-normal month.

(If you didn’t get to read the January newsletter that launched today, you are missing out!)

Still, normal doesn’t mean boring: 2018 is new, the kitchen is new, and books 4 & 5 of the Viola Roberts Cozy Mysteries are ALL NEW!

Occasionally I wonder if I used up some of my luck-stores. My loved ones were all protected from the fires and mudslides. How much good luck is a person entitled to before it gets used up?

Speaking of used things, I used my solid processes to crank out the new audiobooks and get used to the split schedule and nighttime recording again. I think I’m reaching a competence point where I’m DONE with free software, though. That means a new learning curve for using better software to do my work.

There are daily reminders that it will be months before our communities of Santa Barbara and Montecito are back to normal. The dog is newly sad, each day that our beaches are closed. People are still missing after the deadly mudslides, and so many houses were destroyed. It makes me grateful for the prizes and precious memories that I still have.

All of this is the tidal flow of life.

Turning 45 in just under a month reminds me to pay attention to my inner energy tides, doing as much as I can without burning out, becoming bored, or giving up. And this year is the year of focus. On the thing. Whatever the thing is, in the moment; human, work, animal, chore, celebration.

If you see me losing focus, please feel free to gently tap me and share a little reminder, like responding to my newsletter.



Book Review:

Once Upon A Nightmare: A Novella of the Nightmare City seriesOnce Upon A Nightmare: A Novella of the Nightmare City series by P.S. Newman
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Once Upon A Nightmare is a fantastically-paced novella set in a fascinating future LA where dreams (and nightmares) can manifest. The twist of having a main character who discovers she isn’t “real” is an ironically humanizing one and an excellent origin story for a fish-out-of-water superheroine.

I enjoyed the writing and appreciated the lack of distracting typos–a pet peeve of mine that happens more frequently when reading indie books. Newman’s work allowed me to create clear images in my head of a world that has reacted to a supernatural incursion within a lifetime. The factions that spring up around the “shades,” as the manifestations are called, are realistic, and the action sequences are exciting and well-crafted.

The story itself has twists and turns, secrets and hints, allowing the reader the joy of guessing about what will happen next. The ending is very satisfying, and yet a perfect launch point for the full series. This is an urban fantasy world that does not read as dysptopian. Good outcomes are possible, but as in all great stories, the characters are going to have to work to get them.

Full Disclosure: I’ve met the author and she’s a lot of fun.

View all my reviews


Book Reviews: Science Fiction Mystery Romp

Murder on the Orion ExpressMurder on the Orion Express by Nate Streeper
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Murder on the Orion Express is a fun book full of humor and great action sequences, but I had enough trouble with some aspects of it that I didn’t enjoy it as much as I wanted to. The story was sound, the laughs are outstanding, the writing brilliant at times…but inconsistent at others. I enjoyed the main character’s arc and the ending.

I had a hard time following the “sleuthing” of private detective Alan Blades. Pacing was something of a problem for me, with elements of the story moving so “fast,” without enough description, that I got lost and had to re-read.

This book is inspired by, and an homage to, the Agatha Christie book with a similar title, but Streeper fails at the one thing Christie has mastered: Every character, each suspect, is clearly portrayed and easy to keep track of. That was Orion’s biggest failure in my mind: At some point, I had to work REALLY hard to just remember who the suspect characters were. They had names and front-stories; they had actual names and backstories, people I didn’t care about were being killed off right and left, all in a very different world setting, with weapons, machines, and tech unlike our own.

It was hard to keep track of, and as a result, the book wasn’t a smooth, easy read.

Full Disclosure: I know the author and he’s a fantastic guy. I’m listed in the acknowledgments (but I didn’t do a thing).

View all my reviews


Non-Fic Fridays: What Regency Women Did For Us

Non-Fic Fridays: What Regency Women Did For Us

I loved my Finnemore Fridays, and soon I will find a legit way to bring them back, continuing my quest to spread the brilliance of John Finnemore far and wide (without bending any copyright laws).

Until then, let’s talk non-fiction!

There was a major swath of years between 25-35 where I don’t recall reading any non-fiction that wasn’t work-related. But I got married, and my husband’s brain is SO BIG, and so filled with useful stuff, that I decided to be more like him.

About ten years ago, I made a point of reading more widely. including biographies, science, business, and politics. I’ve learned how to tell quickly whether a book will hold my interest: Does it have humor? Does it have a good tone? Does it balance good writing and density of information?

Following this criteria, my favorite non-fic books from the past several years are The Emperor of Scent, by Chandler Burr and A Crack in the Edge of the World by Simon Winchester. Favorite non-fiction audiobooks are The Girl With the Lower Back Tatoo, by Amy Schumer, and The Princess Diarist, by Carrie Fischer.

This weekend I am supposed to attend the Jane Austen Book Club meeting in nearby Ventura, but the freeway will still be closed due to the Montecito mudslides. As a result, you, Dear Readers, gain from my book club’s loss.

Here are the Questions posed, and my answers about What Regency Women Did For Us.


This is a nice reference book, not an engaging read. The author has summarized a lot of research without telling any stories about Regency women that made me really enjoy reading about them.


1. Out of the 12 women described in this book, who was your favorite person, and why? (you can’t say Jane Austen)

Thanks to Knowles, the women were reduced to nearly identical, narrow descriptions. Childhood, struggles, education, pursuits…I found it hard to tell them apart, and I believe they all felt “the same” because the author didn’t have an attitude, or make an emotional distinction between them.

I found myself wondering if she had put them into the book in a particular order for any reason, and yes, they are ordered according to their date of birth. Very fair. Knowles presented some brilliant women to rectify history. A worthy goal, except her work leaves out sufficient details or narrative threads to interest me. What was presented frustrated me as a reader. If she was trying to make me want to toss her book in the garbage and go do my own research, in that, Knowles has succeeded.

This is teaching history at it’s worst: merely sketching important characters, including their birth, death, and contributions without engaging the learner unduly. I can’t say I truly “liked” any of the subjects. I don’t feel I know who they really were. (She even made me feel momentarily ambivalent about JA! (A feat of amazingly blasé writing.)

2. Who was your least favorite?

Ditto rant above.

3. Was there any person in this book you had never heard of that particularly impressed you?

Jane Marcet’s ability to present complicated information in a format that increases widespread comprehension is a skill I am particularly impressed by.

4. Did you feel that there were women in the book who should not have been included? Any you know of that should have been?

No, all the women in the book met the criteria set by the author: They left an admirable legacy behind. I don’t know of anyone missing, but then, I am not a student of British women’s history.

5. Which of these 12 women do you feel had the greatest impact on Regency England or to life in the Regency era?

I have to point to Jane Marcet again, as her manuals for disseminating learning are likely to have touched the most individuals.

6. How did marriage, or a lack of marriage, influence these women’s lives?

In the same way marriages influence women today: Good ones allow partners to become the best people they can be; bad ones distract, disrupt, and deprive the world of talent.

7. Did you feel that there were any instances when being a woman actually was an advantage in any of these 12 cases?

Being a beautiful woman has always been an advantage – a source of power – when used wisely. This is especially true in the stories of Sarah Siddons and Harriott Mellon, who needed to be seen and admired on the stage.

8. Do you feel that there are any commonalities between the lives of these 12 women?

They are all presented as being born street-smart, clever, or perceptive…whatever your word is for an innate intelligence. Though their education, circumstances, and encouragement all differed, each one had not only an intrinsic drive, but the power to discern a plan for making a good life and follow the plan.

9. What do you think about the title of the book?

As a play on the question, “What have Regency Women ever done for me?” it is fairly clever. The “Us” in the book feels predominantly British and scientific, which is a bit distancing, as I am neither British nor a scientist.

10. What do you think of the writer’s style?

Very academic.
Except when it is exclamatory!
But seriously, Knowles should absolutely write for Wikipedia. This book feels like a JASNA presentation or paper that was expanded…these women are represented at a superficial level.

True to its title, the book focuses on the outcomes of the women’s lives too much to make it a “good read.” It almost discounts the women themselves, in favor of their accomplishments. I think the book tries, but it does not succeed in going deep enough to make the reader see these women as the heroines of important stories that should be told. This is a failure (or perhaps it was exactly the intent) of the distant writing tone, the segmented structure, and the academician’s refusal to let the most interesting bits of the women’s lives be the central story.

Lest I seem harsh, I praise Knowles for creating an excellent piece of reference material. The book is a good starting point for a young person curious about the era, about women’s roles in history, or how to go about finding additional works for researching any of these women (Bibliographies! May they live forever!).



Whatcha Readin’?

You’ve seen the fiction binge I’ve been on since December, so this post is about the non-fiction books on my To Be Read (TBR) pile.

Wonderland: How Play Made The Modern World, by Steven Johnson, is one of the books on my currently reading stack. I love his premise that creation for the sake of joy spurred on the making of many modern inventions.

“‘Each epoch dreams the one to follow, creates it in dreaming,’ The French historian Michelet wrote in 1839. More often than not, those dreams do not unfold within the grown-up world of work or war or governance. Instead, they emerge from a different kind of space: a space of wonder and delight where the normal rules have been suspended. Where people are free to explore the spontaneous, unpredictable, and immensely creative work of play. You will find the future wherever people are having the most fun.”

I can’t wait to delve further into all the cool inventions generated by fun, like The Writer, a little mechanical automaton built between 1768 and 1774, which could be “programmed” to pen up to 40 characters.

In an oddly similar vein, the Jane Austen Book for the month is What Regency Women Did For Us, by Rachal Knowles. Chapter one, The King’s Stone Maker is about Eleanor Coade, who bought and ran a successful manufactured stone business in 1769. The title refers to the fact that she was commissioned to provide stoneworks for both George III and the Prince Regent, eventually George IV, not to mention hundreds of prominent figures and buildings from the late 1700 to early 1800s.

Forget the fact that women didn’t “do” such things; forget that women were expected only to marry and have children; Coade tinkered with the formula for the stone, designed the ornaments, marketed successfully, and lived, I have to assume, happily and fulfilled until the age of 88.

Tackling Designing Your Life: How to Build a Well-Lived, Joyful Life, by Bill Burnett & Dave Evans, is something I’ve been meaning to do for a while now. I read the preface aloud to my dearest cousin on a beautiful drive from Napa to the coast, and I adore the idea that our lives have iterations which we can be increasingly purposeful about…making a life by design, as it were.

Since I attribute so much of my life to chance, and since my work-life, in particular, is in flux, I am excited to work through the book, learning what I can about trying things (and not being afraid to fail).

If you become open minded enough to accept reality, you’ll be freed to reframe an actionable problem and design a way to participate in the world on things that matter to you and might even work.

This lovely quotation is one I intend to take to heart. After completing the dashboard in chapter one, I know I need to spend more time (and get smarter about the time I do spend) on the narration and writing I am doing right now. What that will look like I’m not sure yet, but I have lots of ideas to try out.

Another book sitting in the stack for a long time (years??) now is Refuse to Choose, by Barbara Sher. Her theory (one I find very comforting) is that some people are what she calls “Divers.” They dive deeply into an area of pursuit or thing they love, are completely fulfilled by it, successful at it, and never feel any lack or need for anything else.

Other people are “Scanners,” people who find ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING interesting, stimulating, and pursuit-worthy. Can you guess which category I fall into?

The book was recommended to me by an older friend I admire enormously (and in fact, I think she gave me the book). She is a talented artist, and after a tour of her home and her art studio, I think she saw the scanner in me.

The first chapter is about putting a few things into practice that help a scanner set themselves up to be successful. One is a Scanner Daybook, a special journal only for fun ideas which you may (or may not) ever get around to. The purpose of the scanner daybook is to enjoy the fact that you are a person who simply has interesting ideas all the time.

Giving that creative mind of yours a chance to have some fun is like giving a plant sunshine and water.

A side effect of the workbook is that it teaches scanners to give themselves permission to enjoy the process of brainstorming whatever they are taken by in that moment. Forgiving themselves–or being at peace with–the fact that every one of their ideas probably won’t come to pass.

I do constantly “get on myself” for all the unfinished things in my life. I have started so many exciting projects I would enjoy doing (and I know my husband is like this as well). A key part of being a functioning scanner, according to Sher, is acknowledging that:

A Scanner is curious because she is genetically programmed to explore everything that interests her. If you’re a Scanner, that’s your nature. Ignore it and you’ll always be fretful and dissatisfied.

Sher points out that until the mid-fifties, Rennaisance men (and women) were highly valued. The shift in our culture toward increasingly narrow fields of study in school, and specialization in professions has made it hard to be what my husband generously calls “A Generalist” (but Sher would call a Scanner).

For several years, I’ve scanned the local job market. Slowly but surely I recognize how hard it is to find a job description where I meet the exact qualifications. Or, alternatively, one that is offering tasks and responsibilities that strike me as broad enough to make the work enjoyable.

My belief that I am capable of doing almost any type of work, and that I would find most ‘new’ endeavors worthwhile and interesting (at least for a while), is definitely in conflict with the concept of a “career path.” Employers want an applicant that focuses on doing more and better of the same type of work they’ve always done, a.k.a. direct experience. If I second guess my eligibility, I suspect that filters insidiously into the job applications I’ve submitted. I love that Sher has compassion for Scanners like me:

“It is essential that you never forget that for most of human history, a person with a wide range of knowledge and abilities was highly valued.”

The second thing (which I have yet to do because it is daunting) is a Living Quarters Map. The exercise is to draw a map of your house and walk through, identifying each thing in every nook and cranny that is in some way “a project” or “an idea.” This is so daunting to me that I’ve decided I am going to have to make the map room by room, in order to not overwhelm myself.

Hopefully, I’ll have a picture of my map for you by next week. If you like the idea, I would love to be encouraged by your maps as well.


The Speed of Narration

The Speed of Narration

Forums are such an interesting place to hang out (when you have the time). This week I participated in an interesting thread about listeners who speed up their audiobooks. It’s a good topic for me to think about as I edit The Body In The Bathtub, due out at the end of this month.

Some people love the chipmunk effect.

Others want it faster than normal, but still sounding like a human.

When I “Accuracy Check” on my recordings, I listen at 1.85x. This is a comfortable speed for me to hear the words on the audio and also read along, seeing every word on the page, just to hear that I read ’em right.

Editing happens at 1.0x of course so that the timing sounds right to someone straight-up-listening. It is during this editing pass that I catch “acting” errors. Those happen sometimes when I choose bad interpretations of the words and only realize just how bad it is when I hear it on the recording. Then as the director, I have to send me, the actor back to the microphone to do a “pickup.” I also catch timing errors here (which I can fix easily).

But when I do my final QA, or “Quality Assurance” check, I listen at both 1.0x and 1.5x (because I know I’ve certainly sped up audiobooks before).

What speed do you listen at? Does it change depending on genre, topic, or narrator?

I would NEVER speed up Zachary Quinto reading The Dispatcher because I can’t get enough of his voice (The book, by Scalzi, is great, BTW).

I couldn’t get through On Writing by Stephen King without a speed change (it has nuggets of wisdom, but parts of that book are not fun to slog through).

Martha Stewert’s The Martha Rules is only palatable at higher speed rates. It is so monotone at regular speed that it is hard to believe she isn’t an android.

Do you have audiobook hits or misses that you love, in whole, or in part because of the speed of narration?


Book Review: The Binge Continues

Book Review: The Binge Continues

My historical romance binge continues with a three-book series called The Extraordinaries, by author Melissa McShane. Let’s be honest: I read these books because of the GORGEOUS covers. It happens.

You will probably enjoy this series if you are a fan of naval war books like the Horatio Hornblower novels but with a fantasy twist, like the Glamourist Histories.

Burning Bright introduces us to a Regency world where children, usually in upper-class families, develop “extraordinary” genetic traits. The powers are an expansion of paranormal concepts like telekinesis, telepathy, and pyrokinesis, and the magic system is well designed and believable.

The novel is a nicely executed read about a woman choosing neither forced marriage nor spinsterhood, but the “third path,” of serving in the British Navy. My initial headlong dive into the book washed up plenty of surprising plot twists and a very satisfying ending. A second-read revealed a few minor issues I glazed over due to enjoyment, but on the whole, it is solid.

Wondering Sight is a middle novel, and for me, the least enjoyable of the trilogy. The pacing bogged down and so did the main character’s arc, both suffering from the same problem: Backstory Baggage. The result is a book that offers a reader unclear expectations and conflicting foreshadowing about the hero/villain, romance element, and the mechanics of the heroine’s Seer powers.

Frankly, a story about a woman who lays on her bed and Dreams or has Visions a lot was going to be problematic. The book’s flow was regularly interrupted by confusing secondary characters, info-dumping and almost entirely unsuitable, unromantic love interest. I finished for the sake of the series, but I wasn’t surprised by anything, and I didn’t really care about the characters by the end of the book.

Abounding Might has the most enjoyable main character of the three books. From a writerly perspective, it may be the strongest, but I like boat stories better than intrigue tales, so #1 is my favorite.

It begins in the way “they” say you’re supposed to start a book: In the middle of the action. I would submit that, while technically “correct,” beginning on a battlefield, with a dead man covered in blood, is an awfully rough place to start a romance.

I appreciated that the heroine of the book pushed boundaries, took huge risks, and suffered consequences for them. A true romance, it was the relationship between the heroine and her hero that made this book a good read.

It did not suffer from the info dump lulls or confusing character substitutions in Book 2, but some heavy-handed foreshadowing of a few plot lines made it a little predictable in the second act. Not so much that there weren’t surprises and misdirections to enjoy at the climax and in the denouement.

Taken as a whole, the series has enjoyable settings, great main characters, a thoughtful magic system, interesting ideas, and is well plotted. Plenty there for a good solid historical, romance, fantasy, Regency binge, if you’re on the lookout for exactly that sort of thing.



2018 Reading Goals: JASNA Book Club

2018 Reading Goals: JASNA Book Club

One of my goals this year is to read more books. Since I love talking about what I read, a way to do that is to read and discuss with my local JASNA chapter (which happens to be the Ventura JASNA Book Club).

If you want to join the fun, we will be reading:

January – What Regency Women Did for Us by Rachel Bowles

February – The Making of Jane Austen by Devoney Looser

March – Eligible by Curtis Sittenfeld

April – Hermsprong; Or, Man as He is Not by Robert Bage; and an essay entitled “Sleeping with Mr. Collins” by Ruth Perry, access at

May – A Secret Sisterhood: The Literary Friendships of Jane Austen, Charlote Bronte, George Eliot, and Virginia Woolf by Emily Midorikawa et al

June – Wives and Daughters by Elizabeth Gaskell

July – Revolutionary Mothers: Women in the Struggle for America’s Independence by Carla Berkin

No meeting in August

September – Persuasion by Jane Austen

October – The Genius of Jane Austen: Her Love of Theater and Why She Works in Hollywood by Paula Bryne

November – Horatio Hornblower: Hornblower and the Atropos by C.S. Forester 

Jane’s Birthday Celebration in December


Reading for Escape

Permission (from me) to immerse myself in books is my favorite thing about the winter holiday. Curling up, warm and cozy, with nothing to do but sleep in, read, and eat holiday foods is one flavor of paradise.

Over the past few years, holiday reading is also about trying to catch up to my annual reading goal. I work on finishing books I started and put down, or pick short, fun reads to allow me to catch up quickly. It has inadvertently become an annual ritual. Last year it was the Brother Cadfael mysteries, and this year I’ve picked the historical romances of Suzanne G. Rogers.

Why historical romance? And why self-published historical romance at that? In addition to my usual decadent span of permissiveness where reading is concerned, I’ve been on an escapism binge. I’m a little depressed. This time of year is hard for a lot of people, and I feel grief more than anything else at holiday time. I’m also very tired of dealing with contractors. I’m also trying to learn more about the self-pub business. I didn’t want to read anything I had to work at.

My binge started on accident when I read Ruse & Romance (The Beaucroft Girls #1). I subscribe to online free/cheap book clearing houses which my self-published friends use to find new readers. Someday, *I* might want to use them, so I’ve signed up for a daily email, filled with books in various genres. I don’t know if I picked this book via Book Bub or eBook Discovery but I glance through each service a couple of times a week.

So far I’ve read eight titles by Rogers and here’s what I notice:

The books appear tightly plotted and the plots are GREAT. The books are paced to perfection. In particular, I enjoy the fact that Rogers’ M.O. is to start off with a trite, “expected” setup, and then twist. And twist. And turn before the next twist. Each time you can see what’s going to happen, like the top of a mountain while on a nice hike, there will be several switchbacks to go through before you’ll reach it. This structure makes the endings deeply satisfying.

Sure, yes, okay, it is romance. Everyone ends up with the right person in the end, the good guys get good outcomes, the bad guys get come uppance…but instead of reading about STUPID characters and screaming at the books, “JUST GO TALK TO HIM!!!” there’s a surprising amount of communication.

Within reason (because they are 19th century characters after all) the protagonists don’t hold back from talking to each other. They have useful confidantes. Rogers writes effectively from many points of view in each book, which is incredibly effective at both endearing the characters to the reader and making the communication realistic. Some plots rely on misunderstandings, but most are based on circumstances that are believable because the worst possible outcome is just as likely as all out success.

When I’m reading any book, I rate it assuming like-is-compared-to-like. What I consider “trashy” or “beach reading” doesn’t compare to “great literature” so I don’t even try. Not all of Rogers’ books earn five stars from me, primarily because some are copy edited better than others and some leave gaping plot holes. Here are some of my reading criteria, I’d love to hear if it matches yours:

  • How do I feel when I finish the book?
  • Did the story answer all the questions it raised?
  • Was I annoyed by typos?
  • Did the pacing give me a disjointed reading experience?
  • Was the book consistent?
  • Am I sad to see the characters go?

I am not going to post the images for these books because I find them off-putting and AWFUL. Historical fiction with modern-sensibility photographic covers irritate me. Still, with these criteria in mind, if you’ve ever been curious about historical romance, please try out one of the books with 5 stars below. I would love to talk with you afterward, hear what you thought of it, and debate the merits:

Larken (Graceling Hall #1)5 stars – The story of a “Miracle Orphan” who loses her well-off parents in a train wreck and is subsequently made penniless by her adopted parents. She retains her whimsical nature and imagination despite all odds, and unexpectedly finds love in an arranged marriage.

Grace Unmasked (The Mannequin #2) – 3 stars – Poor Grace, a low born girl who has to escape to London after she disfigures a lord while defending herself, was plagued by typos, plot holes, and some pacing problems. There were some inconsistencies, but I LOVED the ending!

The Mannequin (The Mannequin #1) – 5 stars – Rosamund = Cinderella + Beauty and the Beast + Princess Diaries + all the good nurse falls in love with her patient stories ever written. It sounds like too much, but again, Rogers does this amazing thing of setting up the tropes and linking them like a mobius strip: You know full well where they’re going, but you just can’t figure out how the story is going to get there.

Spinster – 5 stars – I think this is my favorite of the books. Another thing Rogers is good at is starting her stories on the “day after.” What happens if a plain girl gets jilted and doesn’t find a husband? What are her options? It is a great premise for a strong main character, and I like the way the characters do very human, stupid things. This book is quite lovely, through and through.

The Ice Captain’s Daughter – 4 stars – This book gets only 4 stars because the author set up a devastatingly handsome father, the Ice Captain, and then never utilized him. Poor man. Maybe this was an earlier-career attempt? Instead there were some abominably flat relations who were inexplicably neglectful. Again, GREAT ending, which makes up for a lot.

Duke of a Gilded Age – 5 stars – Rogers’ stand alone novels seem to suit me a bit better than multiple books telling related stories. In this novel, she does a good job of writing a male protagonist who benefits from unusual circumstances. I also like the “younger” feel to the novel (almost historical YA) and the portrayal of young men who should be at odds but end up working together.

Rake & Romance (The Beaucroft Girls #2) – 5 stars – There’s quite a bit of suspension of disbelief required when the wealthy Texans take London by storm in the sequel to Ruse and Romance. Still, assuming anything is possible and good will win out over bad is a prerequisite to enjoying the romance novel. I was especially pleased that this novel caught up all the loose ends from book 1, even redeeming the worst characters from the first book.

Ruse & Romance (The Beaucroft Girls #1) – 5 stars – This is the Rogers book that started my binge. I added it to my list in August, and got around to reading it in December. In this book, poor, beautiful Kitty, with her romantic and intelligent sensibilities, isn’t willing to marry just anyone. Unfortunately, she gets so many proposals that she begins to be labeled a flirt. What I liked about this story is the way that (just like in real life) a lie to fix one problem results in another, often a bigger problem down the line. The solution is a whole lot of happily ever afters, the true reason the romance genre is so beloved by fans.